Mock Jury Trial

Attorney Lane C. Siesky is currently the chairperson of the Evansville Bar Association’s Employment Law Committee.  And, the Employment Law Committee is conducting a mock jury trial for continuing legal education for lawyers in Southern Indiana.

As part of the mock trial, Lane C. Siesky will assist in trying the case with other local attorneys.  US District Court Judge Rick Young will preside over the live mock trial (Featuring Live Stream Jury Deliberations).  The mock trial will be held on March 7, 2012, from 8:30 – 4:30 at the Federal Courtroom in Evansville, Indiana.  Contact Lane C. Siesky or the Evansville Bar Association for more information.

Posted in Employment Law | Leave a comment

Hours of Service and Semi-Truck Litigation

The federal Department of Transportation (DOT) limits commercial drivers’ hours of service through regulations set by the Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration (FMCSA). The FMCSA regulations limit the total number of driving hours and on-duty work hours performed by a commercially-licensed driver before he must go off duty.

FMCSA regulations include three separate limits on commercial drivers. The first is the 14-Hour Duty Limit, which allows up to 14 consecutive hours of on-duty time spent by a driver after 10 consecutive hours spent off-duty. The 14-hour period is strictly calculated, even if a driver takes breaks during the period. An extension may apply if the driver’s semi-truck has a sleeper berth and the driver used the berth to sleep during part of the 14-hour period.

The 11-Hour Driving Limit permits a semi-truck operator to drive the vehicle during 11 hours of the 14-hour duty period. The FMCSA allow 11 hours of consecutive driving to fulfill this limit. Alternatively, the driver may drive for a total of 11 hours to account for gaps in time due to rests or meal breaks. After passing the 11-hour limit, the driver must have 10 consecutive hours off before driving again. The driver may perform other tasks during the 14-hour duty period and after the end of the 11-hour driving period, as long as those tasks do not include driving.

Lastly, a semi-truck driver must comply with the 60/70-hour limit established by federal regulations. The 60/70-hour limit focuses on the total number of on-duty hours during a consecutive seven-day or eight-day period. The applicable limit depends on whether the motor carrier company operates vehicles on every day of the week. If the company operates trucks on every day of the week, the driver’s maximum driving limit is 60 on-duty hours during a seven-day period. After the driver passes the limit, the driver cannot drive again until the on-duty total drops below 60 hours in a seven-day period. If the company does not operate trucks on every day of the week, the limit becomes 70 hours on duty during a consecutive eight-day period.

Hours-of-service regulations seek to protect drivers and the public from unsafe driving practices. Contact experienced Evansville personal injury lawyer Lane Siesky for a free consultation if the driver in a semi-truck accident did not follow the relevant limits.

Posted in Personal Injury and Accident Law | Tagged , , | Leave a comment

Sexual Harassment – Lessons Learned by an Evansville Employment Lawyer

Over the years, many lessons have been learned from sexual harassment cases.

First, the filing of a sexual harassment lawsuit normally has detrimental effects on the alleged harasser’s life.  In fact, just filing a sexual harassment lawsuit can lead to the harasser being fired, getting divorced and otherwise being humiliated.  So, as an attorney, it is important to do the proper due diligence prior to agreeing to file a sexual harassment lawsuit.

When a person is sexually harassing a woman at work, it is common to find that the harasser has sexually harassed other women in the past.  As such, it is important to look for witnesses that have worked around the harasser in the past.  Further, the harasser will often use his authority at work to intimidate female co-workers and keep them from complaining of the harassment.  And if the victim or witnesses do complain or cooperate with an investigation, then they are often the targets of retaliation.

Indeed, the victim often comes under attack not only at work from the harasser, but also from the defense during the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission’s (EEOC) investigation and any subsequent lawsuit.  And, the attack during litigation against the victim often resembles “mud-slinging.”

Therefore, it is crucial that someone considering complaining of sexual harassment or wanting to file a lawsuit be adequately informed by an employment lawyer.  Call Attorney Lane C. Siesky of Siesky Law Firm if you have questions about your employment situation.  Consultations are free.

Siesky Law Firm is a small litigation-focused law firm located in Evansville, Indiana.

 

Posted in Employment Law | Leave a comment

Errors in Filling Prescriptions

Your local pharmacists are probably capable and reliable people, but their jobs are far from easy. They have many tasks, to include supervising technicians, advising customers, servicing the drive-thru window, and making sense of the doctors’ handwriting, all while filling a huge number of prescriptions in a hectic environment. As such, mistakes are bound to happen, and when they do, it frequently leads either to someone not receiving the medicine he or she seriously needs or to someone taking a medication that ultimately does him harm. If you believe that you’ve suffered such harm, you may want to contact an experienced Evansville personal injury attorney to assist you.

Medication error malpractice claims are difficult, and they necessitate expert review by a skilled attorney. When reviewing cases of inappropriately prescribed or improperly filled prescriptions, your lawyer should carefully evaluate your medical conditions and medication history. A well-read attorney will research your conditions through the use of medical textbooks to establish how the medicine should have been prescribed. If an unnecessary error has occurred, your attorney should aggressively ask for fair compensation for you, the victim of a medication error.

What can you do as a consumer to protect yourself from possible medication errors?  First, and probably most importantly, you should always confirm the medications that you get from the pharmacy. Next, if something doesn’t seem right about the medicine, ask questions. Do the pills look different than normal? Are there numbers or markings on the pills, and if so, are they the same as usual? If something looks questionable, you should call the pharmacy or your doctor immediately. Better yet, go back to the doctor or pharmacist to have them review your medication with you. Doing this will help ensure and confirm that the medication prescribed and given to you was, in fact, the medication that your doctor intended for you to take.

If you later find out that you have taken the incorrect medicine, or if you do not feel well after ingesting a newly-filled or refilled prescription, get medical attention immediately. If you need the services of an Evansville personal injury attorney, please call Lane Siesky for a free consultation.

 

 

Posted in Medical Malpractice | Tagged , | Leave a comment

Accident Reconstruction Related to Semi-Truck Litigation

Semi-truck litigation often requires accident reconstruction. Information from the reconstruction may eventually become a key part of your lawsuit. You may want to consider the services of a competent Evansville personal injury lawyer or expert reconstructionist in order to ensure a process runs smoothly and properly. It is essential to meet the legal standards to use the accident reconstruction as evidence in future court proceedings.

A reconstructionist seeks to provide answers when a semi-truck accident occurs. The reconstruction explains the chain of events leading up to the accident and identifies the causes of the accident. This type of information may become important to establishing the cause of action for a personal injury lawsuit.

In order to provide answers, the reconstructionist must review many types of data and information related to the accident. The reconstructionist usually looks at vehicle speeds, points of impact for the accident, magnitude of the impact, time-distance analysis, road conditions, and weather conditions. In addition, the reconstructionist often needs to review the driver’s logs, GPS information, and any available electronic data collected by an on-board device or black box on the semi-truck. An Evansville personal injury lawyer with experience in lawsuits involving semi-truck accidents can further explain the reconstruction process to you or recommend whether you might need to hire an expert in accident reconstruction.

Analysis of information from a semi-truck accident differs from the reconstruction of a car accident that does not involve a commercial vehicle. Semi-trucks and other commercial vehicles are often larger and heavier than regular cars. As a result, pivot, payload, speeds, impact, and other important pieces of information may differ from the information gathered in a car accident. Accordingly, the reconstructionist should specifically have experience with the data and formulas required for crash analysis of commercial vehicles such as semi-trucks.

After completing reconstruction of the accident, the reconstructionist may become an expert witness in your lawsuit. The expert may need to testify as part of the court proceedings if your case requires a trial. An Evansville personal injury lawyer may decide to use the expert testimony as a way to establish your case or to cast doubt on the defense-side expert’s testimony.

For a free initial consultation, do not hesitate to contact experienced Evansville personal injury lawyer Lane Siesky today.

Posted in Personal Injury and Accident Law | Tagged , , , | Leave a comment

The Use of Black Boxes in Car Collision Cases

Most people know that black boxes are installed on airplanes, but fewer know that some automakers have long installed a similar device called an event data recorder (EDR) in their automobiles. EDRs record vehicle inputs and, in the event of a collision, can provide a snapshot of the final moments before impact. That snapshot can then be viewed and analyzed by law enforcement, insurance companies, automakers, and attorneys for those injured in the accident.

Although statistics vary, over 60% of 2005 car models had an EDR installed. Most crash investigations still rely on factors such as skid marks and deformation of the vehicles in the collision. As consumers replace older cars with newer models, more EDR data will become available.

An EDR cannot be turned off, and you’ll probably know little more about it than the fine print disclosure in the owner’s manual. If you have been in an automobile accident, your attorney should find out whether the vehicles were equipped with EDRs. This information is not readily available and is usually only known by the automobile manufacturers themselves. The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) requires that automakers tell consumers if the devices are installed in their cars. That federal rule also outlines what information is recorded and stipulates that it be used to increase vehicle safety.

The regulations are far from comprehensive, however, as automotive EDRs are still a relatively new technology. For example, there is no uniformity in the type of data collected by EDRs. The data (spanning from a few seconds before a crash to up to a few seconds after) may include such information as seatbelt use, speed, air bag deployment, and brake and gas pedal positions. In faulty acceleration cases, for example, if the EDR data shows that a driver had his or her foot on the brake but the car still accelerated, this provides evidence that the car, not the driver, was to blame.

There is also controversy surrounding the inclusion of EDRs in cars and the use of EDR data after car accidents. Some argue that the data can be flat-out wrong if the car is defective, since EDRs rely on the same electronics that could have caused the problems in the first place. However, data from multiple points in the car is unlikely to all be wrong. Others are concerned about privacy and want to make sure that data collected by the EDRs remain secure, especially since after an accident, the data will be highly coveted by car manufacturers, safety regulators, law enforcement, insurers, personal injury attorneys, and the car owners themselves. Some states, like California, have passed legislation barring anyone without a court order from accessing the EDR data.

A NHTSA standard, due to start phasing in this fall and in place by 2012, does not mandate the installation of EDRs in cars, but it requires automakers that do install them to disclose it and requires them to collect certain data, including brake and throttle position.

Contact Evansville personal injury lawyer Lane Siesky for questions about your car collision case.

Posted in Personal Injury and Accident Law | Tagged , , , | Leave a comment

Liability and Personal Injury Claims

The strength of your personal injury claim ultimately depends on the extent to which you can prove that the insured was liable for your injuries. As an Evansville personal injury attorney will explain, this fact pertains to all personal injury claims: car accident, slip-and-fall, or product liability claims.

Unless the insured’s liability is extremely clear-cut, the insurance company will challenge your claim using any evidence it can muster that might suggest the insured was not liable for the injury. If your case is not strong enough to resist these attempts, the value of your claim could be substantially reduced. Indeed, the value of a claim, and the amount you can reasonably expect to settle for, roughly corresponds to your chances of winning at trial. A claimant whose case has a 90% chance of winning at trial can expect a large settlement, whereas a claimant whose case has only a 50% chance of winning can expect a much smaller settlement.

Your chances of winning at trial, and by extension the value of your personal injury claim, is also affected by negligence on the part of parties besides the insured. If your own negligence contributed in any part to your injuries, it can dramatically reduce your case value. Some jurors will not award damages if the claimant was in any way negligent, and the insurance companies can use that to its advantage when negotiating.

Comparative negligence presents a tricky issue because negligence can be hard to determine, and different jurors can interpret situations very differently. Juries have found claimants negligent for waiting at a red light when they were rear ended. If it is clear that your own negligence played almost as big as a role in your accident as the negligence of the insured, your case is in a very bad position.

Certain types of personal injury claims inherently raise questions about comparative negligence, such as motorcycle and slip-and-fall cases.

You will need an experienced personal injury attorney familiar with these issues to get you the best settlement possible. Call dedicated Evansville personal injury attorney Lane Siesky today for a free consultation.

Posted in Personal Injury and Accident Law | Tagged , , , , | Leave a comment

Temporary Agencies and Work Injuries

Suppose an Indiana employee is “employed” by a temporary agency and placed into temporary work in a factory setting.  If that person is injured while working in the temporary placement, does he or she have the right to sue the factory if it was negligent in some way and caused the injury?

The Indiana Court of Appeals said no in Kenwal Steel Corp. v. Seyring.  The Court held that both the temporary agency and the factory would be considered the “employer” under Indiana Worker’s Compensation law.  So, under the facts in the Kenwal case, an injured employee only has right to compensation under Indiana’s Worker’s Compensation law.

However, an injured employee may still need skilled attorney representation to determine which of the two “employers” to notify of the injury and to help insure that medical expenses and injury benefits are properly paid.  Also, it is possible that the employee’s injury may fall within an exception to the general rule and thus, allow a personal injury case to proceed in addition to the worker’s compensation case.

For instance, suppose the work injury was caused by defective equipment.  In that situation, the right to sue the manufacturer of the equipment for personal injuries may still exist.  Attorney Charles Hewins focuses his practice on Worker’s Compensation law and will discuss your case with you in a free consultation.

A litigation boutique firm, Siesky Law Firm, PC consists of attorneys Lane Siesky and Charles Hewins, and is located in Evansville, Indiana.

Posted in Workers Compensation Law | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Steps of a Lawsuits before Trial

If the insurance company absolutely refuses to offer a reasonable settlement for your personal injury claim, your only recourse may be a lawsuit. Your Evansville personal injury attorney will guide you through the specifics of the process, but all lawsuits generally follow the same pattern leading up to the trial.

A lawsuit begins with your attorney filing a “Summons and Complaint,” which is a document that is served to the party liable for your lawsuit and informs him or her of the lawsuit. The document will name that party as the defendant and you as the plaintiff.

Then, the insurance company will appoint a lawyer to the case who will then file an “Answer to the Complaint,” which formally acknowledges the lawsuit. This document may also deny the defendant’s liability for the injury or claim that you have exaggerated the severity of your injury. It may also attempt to claim that someone else besides the defendant is actually liable for your injuries.

After this, the lawsuit enters the discovery phase, in which both your lawyer and the opposing lawyer will formally request information that is necessary to build their cases. The opposing lawyer will most likely request information from you at this point, and you may be compelled to answer a set of questions in writing (called an interrogatory), or you may be interviewed in person in what is called a deposition.

During this phase, both attorneys will request your medical records from your doctors, as well as witness statements the police might have taken. There will also be “requests for admissions,” in which both sides ask each other to identify the parts of the case are in dispute. Your attorney will also compile evidence and may record interviews with or obtain written statements from your doctors and with other witnesses.

Following the discovery phase, attorneys may find it necessary to file pretrial motions in which they ask the court to dismiss evidence or charges that may be improper. Finally, assuming there are no settlement offers from the other side, the trial will proceed.

If you have been injured in an accident and the insurance companies are unwilling to play ball, you need an experienced Evansville personal injury attorney who is willing and able to litigate to get you the money you deserve. Call Evansville personal injury attorney Lane Siesky today for a free initial consultation.

Posted in Personal Injury and Accident Law | Tagged , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Paying Medical Bills After a Personal Injury

If you are involved in an accident and suffer personal injury, you may wonder how to deal with your insurance company while your medical bills rack up. You may be worried about how to pay your medical bills when you don’t have any money and the prospect of a settlement or taking your case to trial is a long way away. An Evansville personal injury attorney may be able to help you through this process and represent your case.

If you are unable to pay your bills as you incur them, you may be wondering if your hospital and medical facilities will demand payment right away. If there is no immediate need for them to be paid, in most cases your doctors and hospitals will wait until your case is resolved, either by settlement or a court verdict, to ask for payment. However, you should let them know as early as you can that you don’t have the means to pay the medical bills as they are incurred.

Your Evansville personal injury attorney will walk you through the process of ensuring that the doctors and medical facilities get paid. In most cases, he or she will have money withheld from the final settlement or court verdict to go directly to the medical facilities and doctors. You will probably have to sign a form, called a subrogation or lien form, at the time of treatment, that allows your attorney to withhold the funds for this purpose.

Unfortunately, you cannot rely on the insurance company of the person who caused your injuries to automatically pay your bills. Most will not automatically pay your medical expenses because they don’t want to spend a substantial amount on your case and then be hit with a large or excessive settlement demand at the end of the case that may require them to take on the additional expense of defending a lawsuit. Additionally, most insurance companies prefer to wait for the letter of demand from your attorney and end the case with just one lump payment.

If you have further questions about paying your medical bills while your case is ongoing, contact Evansville personal injury attorney Lane Siesky for a free evaluation of your case.

Posted in Personal Injury and Accident Law | Tagged | Leave a comment